How can NSF and successful CCLI grantees foster better dissemination of CCLI-developed educational innovations?
Participants
byBrandon MuramatsuonFebruary 21, 2010
Participant
Organization
Robert Beichner
North Carolina State University
James Brey
American Meterological Society
Ingrid Burbey
Virginia Tech
Stephen Crown
University of Texas-Pan American
Melissa Dancy
Johnson C. Smith University
Steve Ehrmann
The TLT Group
Norman Fortenberry
National Academy of Engineering
Eric Freudenthal
University of Texas – El Paso
Michael Gage
University of Rochester
Shelly Gordon
Farmingdale State, NY
Kelly Gull
American Society for Microbiology
Eric Hamilton
Pepperdine University
Kaye Howe
NSDL Resource Center
David McConnell
North Carolina State University
Flora McMartin
Broad Based Knowledge
Karen Miu Miller
Drexel University
Brandon Muramatsu
MIT
Jeanne Narum
Project Kaleidoscope
Peter Hugo Nelson
Benedictine University
Nancy Paleaz
Purdue University
Michael Pearson
Mathematical Association of America
Rockford J. Ross
Montana State University
Dan Sayre
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Elaine Seymour
University of Colorado, Boulder
Cathy Skokan
Colorado School of Mines
Joe Tront
Virginia Tech
David Yaron
Carnegie Mellon University
Alan Wolf
University of Wisconsin
Deborah E Allen
NSF
Celeste Carter
NSF
Connie K Della-Piana
NSF
Joyce Evans
NSF
Stephanie Fitchett
NSF
Linnea Fletcher
NSF
Scott Grissom
NSF
Susan H Hixson
NSF
Ann McKenna
NSF
Don Millard
NSF
Russell Pimmel
NSF
Herbert H Richtol
NSF
Hannah Sevian
NSF
Linda L Slakey
NSF
About this Site
We convened a study group in February 2010 consider the question: How can NSF and successful CCLI grantees foster better dissemination of CCLI-developed educational innovations? The study group participants ranged from PIs of small focused grants to large dissemination efforts. Expert guests represent publishing in both the profit and non-profit sectors, researchers concerned with dissemination of STEM educational innovations, the NSDL and NSF program staff.